Wednesday, May 15, 2019

Taking Up Arms Against Slavery by John Brown Essay

Taking Up Arms Against Slavery by John Brown - show Exampleality and exclusion from the political system there may sometimes be no other(a) way to reassign things. I believe that advanced observers would agree with John Browns subject if he meant the blood of soldiers, but disagree if the blood of civilians was involved. One of the major influences that would affect a modern observers view on whether blood should or should not be spent in a political cause is terrorism. The introduction changed on September 11, 2001, when a group of terrorists who saw themselves as freedom fighters trying to strike a blow against a country that was, in their views, making the world a less holy place, crashed two planes into the Twin Towers and killed thousands of peck who were civilians that were, as much as iodine could be, solely disassociated with Western-Arab conflict. Since then suicide tactics throw off risen to prominence as a machine for radical Islamists everywhere, much to the di staste of observers everywhere else, who now get wind knowing killing ones self to kill others despicable. This Event also brought into the American mind how truly awful it is when civilians are killed in conflict, which is an inevitable consequence of most wars, which has led to massive discontent in America and around the simpleness of the world when Western governments take actions that could and do cause civilian casualties. This has led those countries to develop new technologies and completely change the way they conduct warfare to reduce civilian casualties. This, coupled with a largely prohibit view of the decade long war in Iraq, means that people today tend to have a more negative view of warfare generally they recognize better that in whatsoever war civilians will suffer and die, which usually just escalates a conflict, causing things to get worse. In this light, a modern observer would in all probability disagree with Browns words they would say that people should find a way other than killing and being killed to achieve their ends. On the other hand, modern people do recognize that sometimes there may be no other way to change an unjust political system than through furiousness, and sometimes people who are unwilling to use violence will simply continue to be the victims of it, like what probably would have occurred in Libya had the population not armed themselves. The Arab Spring, as it is called, has been hailed as an amazing demonstration of a peoples willingness to fight for their freedom, dismantle when the fight turns bloody, and indicates that modern people still can understand fighting and dying for a cause. thither are several factors that help these uprisings overcome the reservations that people have about warfare that were outlined above. The first, and probably most important, is that the people were acting largely in self defense. They were an unarmed populace being brutalized by an armed body, and had to take up arms to def end themselves. The second is

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.